Why FSG and Klopp Must Go...

Why FSG and Klopp Must Go...

Sorry, I didn’t quite have space to write my full title: Why FSG and Klopp Must Go On as Before.

Now that I have your attention, I’m going to take you back a short while.

On the morning of August 31st, ‘Liverpool Twitter’ was a happy place: Liverpool were still in for Lemar and Van Dijk. Yet, predictably, the FSG Out group were circling, ready to pounce, looking for a slip-up, to prove their own misguided hypotheses right, in their eyes, and of course, get a few more followers and retweets.

It’s been some time since the window closed, and we’ve had some time to really look at the window, without the cloud of transfer rage obscuring the facts.

But here’s one example of the sort of extremist, hardline, nonsensical approach that defines the FSG out group, from an account with a significant following:

So, let’s just get this straight, just for my sake. After buying Mohamed Salah, for a club record fee, then somehow securing the services of one of the most exciting prospects in the world – Naby Keïta – in a cut-price and preemptive deal, whilst also committing 70m GBP to try and purchase AS Monaco’s Thomas Lemar, FSG have not yet convinced you of their commitment to the club? Not only this, but for some reason, your judgement comes not from the previous seven years, but a single day, which is dependent on negotiations, cooperation with other clubs and subject to market fluctuations? Ok.

What about that pretty new Main Stand? No?

How about appointing Jürgen Klopp? (We’ll come to this later) Still not sure?

Net spend? Well, under FSG Liverpool have turned profit in one window alone. With some quick, but shoddy maths, I’ve calculated FSG’s net transfer expenditure at well over 200m GBP.

Maybe the line on Philippe Coutinho, that under no circumstances would he leave Liverpool was a bit too ambiguous for them.

Well, here it is, verbatim:

‘We wish to offer clarity as regards our position on a possible transfer of Philippe Coutinho.

The club’s definitive stance is that no offers for Philippe will be considered and he will remain a member of Liverpool Football Club when the summer window closes.’

If you still don’t understand that, I’ll provide a concise translation.

‘The club’s definitive stance is that no offers for Philippe will be considered and he will remain a member of Liverpool Football Club when the summer window closes.’

Oh, sorry, that’s about as concise and definitive as it gets.

The owners wanted to send a clear message, that Liverpool is a club on an upward trajectory, is a club that does not sell, and a club that certainly is not bullied or pushed around. For me, a Liverpool fan, this is music to my ears, the equivalent of the fourth movement of Beethoven’s 9th. This is exactly what I want to hear from my club and the owners. A professional, determined and driven sense of direction coming from the very top – with a clear ambition for Liverpool to be one of the best clubs, in terms of competing, in the world, again, plain to see.

You may have noticed it was actually FSG that issued the statement – not the board. It’s actually very rare that you’ll find the owners of a club, when they own multiple assets, issuing such a statement, regarding one player. This was almost certainly a direct intervention from the very top, something that I, personally, welcome, as it illustrates commitment and attention at the very least.

But yeah, FSG out.

Just imagine Liverpool let Coutinho go, and then got trounced, as they did, by Manchester City. The entire commentary would be focussed on why Liverpool let Coutinho go, and how it cost them against City. The FSG out bunch would be in full force, tweeting abuse at John Henry, his wife, and Peter Moore (who, I should add, and like Ms. Pizzuti, has no responsibility for transfer policy).

Naturally, I understand your frustration if you feel the club failed in the transfer window, to sign a centre-back. Is that FSG’s fault? Well, as fans of Rafael Benitez, I’m sure we’re all familiar with cold, hard facts, and the simple fact of the matter is that the Liverpool manager, Jürgen Klopp, wanted Virgil Van Dijk alone. Klopp informed Micheal Edwards that Van Dijk was his man, and appears committed to attempting to sign him in the future.

After the ‘tapping-up’ farce, that resulted from a leak within the club, Southampton had every right to refuse to sell their club captain, who was, and still is contracted to them. Liverpool, understanding this, knew they could only make an offer providing Southampton invited them.

It’s hardly as if FSG did not back Klopp with regard to Van Dijk, the money was there, as Paul Joyce – the most reliable journalist on Merseyside – confirmed.

Here’s Klopp himself talking about how he’s happy with his defenders.

‘Look out there and tell me five that would make us stronger. Five. Then you win a prize. It’s difficult how it is,” said Klopp, following Liverpool’s 3-1 win over Athletic Bilbao last weekend.

‘We have four. I don’t think we need more. We cannot force the things and we would never get a centre back just because (of the sake of it).

‘I’m happy. You can imagine we are still working on different things and we will see if it works. I am already here to work with this squad and not just always thinking ‘but if we don’t get this or this’.’

I understand Klopp is not going to come out and criticise his group of defenders, but logically, if he was really concerned, he would have used the money that was available to him to buy another centre-back. Do I think Klopp should have purchased a centre-back? Of course. But that’s his decision, not one from the owners, and conflating them is simply stupid.

How then is John Henry responsible for Liverpool not signing Van Dijk? The answer is, he isn’t. And if you think he is, you need a Zaf Iqbal examination.

The Van Dijk deal was dead from the point Liverpool publically apologised and Southampton reiterated their stance that, like Coutinho, under no circumstances would he be leaving the club. If you believe ITK accounts, with dubious and unverifiable connections to the club ahead of events that have unfurled publically and in front of your own eyes, that’s your problem. Not the club’s, not Klopp’s, and not FSG’s.

Look at the state of ‘ITK’s’. I mean really. Have a look at how they build their brand, and announce ‘news’.

Here’s one such tweet:

It took two and a half hours for the follow-up tweet:

Now, I have nothing against people who try to engage and converse with the Liverpool fanbase, hell, I’m one of those people, albeit one with a rather small personal following. What I will say though, is have a think about the ‘news’ you read. If Paul Joyce had received real information on the deal of the season, would he have sat on that scoop for over two hours? Erm, no.

“ITKs” contributed to the Van Dijk deal collapsing. Not FSG. So if you want to vent at someone for Liverpool’s transfer failures on Twitter, it shouldn’t be John Henry, et al.

This all feeds into the FSG Out group though, a group that will also base their claims on falsehoods, conjecture and lies.

This group is anything but pro-Liverpool. It’s simply about populism and individualism, both of which are deemed more important than the club. Here’s another example:

Now, there’s certainly a few credible points to be made about Liverpool losing Origi. Will Liverpool be left short upfront? Will Origi’s confidence take a hit, with Solanke coming in to replace him? Is this poor management by Klopp?

Unfortunately, instead of asking the right questions, one FSG Out proponent, with a large following, angrily tweeted about profit. On a loan deal.

‘Profit’, for a player who struggled last season, and is likely to do so again, for minutes – hardly a position he would welcome, especially considering it’s a World Cup season.

I’m no FSG apologist, but the FSG Out group within the fanbase is a hardline, populist, cancerous cult, that needs to be sidelined, ignored and cut out. Unrelenting in its criticism, selective in its praise, and unremittingly blinkered. They provide simple answers for complex questions, and they simply are not true. If you value analysis and facts about your club there are plenty of outlets that are not just seeking retweets and publicity – there’s the Tomkins Times, the Anfield Wrap, Anfield HQ, us, here at AnfieldIndex (who, I can personally guarantee, are unbeholden to any agendas) and all of these will try to find the answers to those complex questions, to the best of our ability.

Now though, there’s an even more radical club of loonies, the “Klopp Out” group of ‘supporters’.

After a draw against Burnley, a defeat in the League Cup – which nobody really cares about – and then a draw against Spartak Moscow, the Klopp Outers have, and were in full-force.

‘Klopp OUT!’

‘Klopp is s**t’

‘Even Rodgers was better than this idiot’

These are just three messages from a Liverpool Whatsapp group chat that I’m in. If you go onto Twitter you’ll no doubt find more of the same or worse.

Now let’s really try and get a grip on what these people are saying.

After reaching the Europa League final in his first season – beating Dortmund and United in the process – and then after delivering Champions League football to Liverpool, (for the second time since 2008/9) in the toughest race for qualification in living memory, and building an offensive line that can obliterate any side, all in under three years, you want him gone?

Ok.

One of the most coveted managers in world football, with a philosophy that suits Liverpool to a tee, and you want him gone?

Sure.

Because Klopp didn’t sign Van Dijk, he should resign?

Well, I guess we could do with some depth on the wing too, but personally, I wouldn’t get too worked up about us not signing Neymar.

Maybe I’d understand if Liverpool’s previous manager was Alex Ferguson, and Liverpool had provided Klopp with a title-winning team when he joined. But if I remember correctly, Klopp inherited a team that got bullied by Stoke, 6-1, and its only major additions were Christian Benteke and Roberto Firmino – who Rodgers played out of position.

Yet this means nothing – the Klopp and FSG Out fans are all too short-minded, they seem to forget the dark days of Hodgson, where he admitted that relegation was a prospect for Liverpool. Do you really want this?

If Klopp goes, who are Liverpool going to get in? Redknapp, Bruce, Allardyce? It’s truly amazing that when under the slightest bit of scrutiny, the whole idea falls apart, yet people back it wholeheartedly. The whole idea is to simply get rid of Klopp and then everything will be fantastic, and the sooner the club does it, the better.

There’s no analysis, alternatives, or considered thought to it all. Pochettino is often cited as an example of success, but ironically he was supported financially and given time to build his team. The exact same support these fans are not giving.

In fact, this all reminds me of a certain referendum, of which the consequences are not panning out all too well. But that’s something for another time.

I was sure the Klopp outers were taking the mickey initially, but they genuinely do believe it. It’s almost as if they’re living in a fantasy world, where Liverpool have a divine right to win, just for them. This is football. If you can’t cope with a draw against Burnley, you may as well pack your fucking bags, because even Real Madrid drop points from time to time. This is not FIFA, and listening to FIFA players does not offer any real insight to what’s going on at the football club at all. (See image below).

If you look at the football Liverpool are playing, which is comfortably the second or third best in the league, you’ll realise, Liverpool are just a bit unlucky at the moment. It’s individual errors that have cost Liverpool – against Watford, Man City, Sevilla, Leicester and now Spartak Moscow.

Really, look at the goals and point out which of those are Klopp’s fault. I’m talking about the system and tactics he uses. And when you do look at those goals – as I have, on my tactical breakdowns, which you can find on the site – you can see why Liverpool have dropped points, and more often than not it’s because of some individual error you cannot account for, such as Lovren missing the ball, Matip leaving a header, Karius not positioning himself well enough, a midfielder not tracking his man properly, or the team of officials being useless in enforcing the laws of the game.

The team performances in all of those games, (and up until the red card, against Man City) were good. Liverpool created chances but failed to convert them. Surely you can remember the days in which Rodgers’ Liverpool passed in front of the opposition defensive line meaninglessly until they were dispossessed and the opposition scored?

That’s all it is, a few individual errors, and some awful finishing – there’s no way this will last, and demanding the manager’s head for good performances, but underwhelming results is misguided at best, and fucking stupid at worst.

That’s right, if you’re Klopp out, you’re actually a fucking idiot. There’s simply no two ways about it. It really makes no sense at all, and if you can’t get your head around that, you truly are lost.

Football manager or FIFA is probably the best option if you want Klopp or FSG out; there you can live out your fantasy, and win every single game without conceding, proving that you really do know everything. Of course, there are better managers and owners in the world: Carlo Ancelotti and Manchester City’s Sheikh Mansour for example. But Liverpool would struggle to prise Ancelotti away from Bayern Munich, and there simply is not enough money in the world for every club to have a billionare owner, with near limitless resources.

We should not be afraid to give credit where it’s due. Some fans are blinkered when it comes to players, be it Mignolet or Moreno or Henderson. When they play well it’s only because of somebody else, or the manager. But we should be happy to be proved wrong. Many fans did not have faith in Firmino when he arrived, or Mané, now they’re two of the best players in the league. Likewise, it seems, right now, that FSG have developed into owners that are committed to the club, after a shaky start, that looked defined by a corner-cutting approach.

If you want to criticise FSG, do it properly: have a look at my assessment of their tenure, from the end of the 2016/17 season.

The Seven Year Itch | FSG – A Review

Want us, or me, to reassess FSG after the summer window? Tweet at us, comment. Let us know – and if FSG are poor, or need to go, we’ll let you know, and we’ll back it up with facts. So when you talk about FSG and Liverpool down in the pub, you won’t be the loony in the corner, delivering a spiel nobody cares about.

It’s strange for me though, I’m hardly old, but I remember when FSG bought the club. I also remember what Hicks & Gillett did to the club. My father has also told me about how Liverpool’s owners, before Hicks & Gillett, neglected the commercial and business side of the club, and effectively allowed Manchester United, Chelsea and Arsenal to grow, as Liverpool regressed. At least with FSG, I’ve seen considerable progression over the past two seasons, and an undeniable effort during this summer window too.

Arsenal, who Liverpool recently battered, are a public laughing stock, because of terrible mismanagement by their owners and board. The FSG Out group seem to have the answers to everything, but there’s a very real possibility that if Liverpool were sold, we could well have owners like those at Arsenal, who rarely attend games, invest minimal capital, and siphon off resources. The FSG Out group should be careful what they wish for and actually open their eyes to the ownership who have delivered on their promises, in this window at least.

Liverpool fans should reciprocate this good faith, shown by the owners in appointing and supporting Klopp, but also in reinvesting in the team, squad, stadium, and commercial-side of the club. We’re now seeing a greater level of engagement than before, with Peter Moore a constant and positive presence on Twitter for instance.

The ‘200m GBP warchest’ that was reported was backed up too, even with Liverpool’s 70m+ GBP deal for Lemar not reaching fruition:

FSG have put their money where their mouth is. They’ve backed the manager, even in a ridiculous market, they’ve steadfastly refused to bend to pressure to sell Liverpool’s star player, Coutinho. Even for the most staunch FSG Out people, surely this must mean something.

It’s time for these ‘fans’ to stop plugging themselves, and stirring up nonsense, and instead to get behind the team and the club, like a real fan. As Liverpool finally seem to be on the right track.

Klopp is so close to a team that can do something very special, all it takes is a bit of luck, and some intelligence from the Liverpool players. And, after the FSG outers demanded FSG step up, they did. Now with a little patience and common sense, it will soon be time to reap the rewards of both their work and investment.

Listen to Liverpool FC legends like Jan Molby and Peter Beardsley as well as the best tactical and statistical analysis on Liverpool FC exclusively on AnfieldIndex Pro! Subscribe Now!
Thanks for rating this! Now tell the world how you feel via Twitter. .
How do you feel about this post?
  • Excellent
  • Informative
  • OK
  • Good Read
  • Awesome

Comments

9 responses to “Why FSG and Klopp Must Go…”

  1. David says:

    Although a big fan of Klopp , I still think criticism keeps the owners and players on their toes . If for example there was no pressure from fans for transfers or against the players and manager for not converting chances into goals , we might not get that extra reaction . So as much as I am happy with what looks like progress albeit with ups and downs on the way , the critics are doing there part by keeping the club on their toes and giving the players a point to prove

  2. Anirudh Takkar says:

    This article is very convenient. The Van Dijk deal was dead???!!! You, like everyone else, were very much hopeful of a deal being struck on deadline day. It’s easy to come out after the fact and act like you knew all along it was not happening.

  3. Ernest says:

    kindly add me to your WhatsApp group chat……+233246868142

  4. Dan says:

    One of the things that has always made me proud of being a Liverpool supporter is that we’ve always been viewed as one of the more intelligent supporter groups, more considered and patient, not constantly demanding the manager/board be sacked the moment a bad result comes in. We’re in a blip, every team has one every season, last year Chelsea had one at a similar time before Conte fixed thing and turned their season around.
    I think his wisdom is often overlooked because of his age and personality but I have a feeling that some of Klopp’s quotes will still be echoing around Anfield for decades, especially those like “titles are not won in September”.

  5. Ash says:

    Well written piece and a timely reminder that, all things considered, we have pretty decent owners. I’m not one to dwell on the past, of course they saved the club at it’s time of need and kudos to FSG for that. But now they must be judged on their performance; both now and going forward. Do they make mistakes? Of course, which owner doesn’t? But unlike many other owners they are humble enough to come out and apologise or take intervention when necessary. They came out and said Coutinho wasn’t for sale this summer because they know the strategic importance of retaining one of our best players, much as Leipzig did with Keita. Even if it was a compromise for only one season.

    Sadly the FSG debate will continue for as long as they are owners because many people don’t understand the way a responsible owner needs to operate.

    On Klopp, he’s FSG’s man and they will rightly stand by him. For all the talk of sacking the man, who do we bring in. There’s very few world class managers and we saw this week with Ancelotti that he’s a short term guy. He’s not into detailed tactics and isn’t one for rebuilds. He needs money and a top class group of players to succeed. The long term project of LFC is not for him, in the same way that Mourinho is not the long term fit for United.

    A bit more patience, analysis and less hysteria after every result would be most welcome.

  6. Window says:

    Next up from the ‘Klopp out’ brigade: What has Wagner ever done for Huddersfield?

    Also note this:
    2016: Klopp says he won’t answer Qs from the Sun.
    2017: News International (Sun owners) writers (Shearer) plus ex Man Utd pundits (Neville , Savage etc) converge to attack Liverpool simultaneously.
    Plus Sky (Murdoch again) attempt to get fixtures changed to damage liverpool schedule at christmas.
    Its revenge of the Murdoch time.

  7. John Stefan says:

    Must disagree. FSG have not stepped up. A net spend comparable to Huddersfield and Watford and Leicester is nowhere near what was required. To be seen to buying is not actually buying. “But Other clubs didn’t want to sell…” no club is actively putting players up for sale…. if you want a player you must make them a big enough offer, which is what FSG do not do regularly. Until they do that then I consider them to have not stepped out. Keep Klopp he’s great, ditch the owners they’re profiteers!!!!!! FSG out

  8. NERed says:

    Agreed. No doubt FSG are committed to owning the club as an asset. The new stand pays for itself in 4 years which is a no-brainer. It could be argued that keeping Coutinho increases the value of the club similar to the view taken by PSG owners on signing Neymar – that it increased the value of PSG by 200m. It’s on the pitch that they are not doing enough. I sometimes wonder how many titles we would have won if the Dubai Investment Company had took control. They may have stuck around for just 7 years but we would be on a different level by 5 years ago.

  9. steen barr says:

    This article could have been written from a middle of the road point of view, the author neglected to mention : 1. New stadium promised
    2. The single-minded approach to only one central defender needed
    3. The insistence of keeping a very poor left back
    4. No proper policy on a goalie
    5. Where is the evidence that the players especially defensively would be improved
    6. Was the “Ox” really needed?
    7. Telling us that Lovren is a good defender and clearly Hendo and Wino are nothing more than squad players.
    8. Leaving CAN to run down his contract
    9. Not taking all Cup games with the proper amount of respect
    10. Placing promise over experienced talent
    The owners can do what they like with their money, but not addressing the defence for such a long time is negligent, especially when a defender was available. Klopp does not have to be perfect, but not seeing that Sturridge is a dead pony sums up the oil tanker turning radius of the man and the fact that everything was left so late in the transfer market indicates his inability for preparation and his willingness to adapt if things do not go your way during a crisis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Published by Anfield Index
Updated: 2017-09-28 12:31:17
7,291 Views

Listen to Molby, Beardsley and Paul Dalglish talk on AI Pro for FREE!

TRY FREE 7 DAY TRIAL NOW

Holler Box