Liverpool Eye Kevin Schade as Brentford Set £60m Price for Versatile Forward
Liverpool’s forward planning is already under scrutiny ahead of the January window, and TeamTalk reports that Brentford attacker Kevin Schade is firmly in the conversation. The 24-year-old has admirers at Anfield, with Arsenal also credited as serious contenders, and the early indication is that any winter deal would require a fee in excess of £60 million.
That valuation is significant, but it also reflects the market for Premier League-proven attackers who can operate across the front line. Schade’s profile appears to align closely with what Liverpool are understood to value in attacking recruitment, mobility, positional flexibility and the capacity to cover multiple roles without a major drop in level.
Kevin Schade price set for January
Brentford are in a strong position. Schade has made an impressive start to the season, scoring three goals in six appearances, and his contribution has helped push Keith Andrews’ side into the upper reaches of the table. That context matters. Clubs do not willingly part with productive forwards in mid-season unless the offer becomes too good to ignore.
The report states: “Kevin Schade has emerged as one of the Premier League’s most discussed attacking talents, with TEAMtalk able to confirm that Arsenal and Liverpool are both interested in a potential transfer,” they wrote. “The 24-year-old German has scored three goals in six appearances for Brentford this season, helping the Bees remain unbeaten and rise to fourth in the table. “Sources have confirmed Brentford would demand more than £60million for any January move, a figure well above Schade’s current market valuation of around £42million, per Transfermarkt. “We understand that Arsenal and Liverpool are regarded as the most interested parties, having tracked him towards the end of the previous window.”

For Liverpool, the central question is whether that figure represents urgency pricing or fair market value. January almost always inflates costs, particularly when the selling club has no pressure to do business.
Liverpool transfer need in attack
Liverpool’s need for another forward is understandable. Squad depth remains a live issue, especially when availability becomes uncertain and selection options narrow quickly. Schade’s appeal lies in the fact that he has featured from the left, through the middle and on the right during his career, offering the kind of versatility that can protect a squad through congested periods.
That is often what separates interest from action. Liverpool do not simply need numbers, they need functional depth, players capable of stepping into different attacking roles depending on injuries, form or tactical demands. Schade appears to tick a number of those boxes.
There is also the wider market to consider. When comparable attacking options are being discussed at fees beyond £60 million, Brentford’s stance becomes easier to understand. Whether Liverpool share that view internally will shape how seriously this develops.
Brentford forward fits modern recruitment model
Schade would not arrive as a traditional specialist for one position. He looks more like the modern multi-role attacker many top clubs now prioritise, someone who can stretch play, attack space and slot into various systems. That adaptability can be particularly attractive to a head coach seeking tactical flexibility across a long season.
Liverpool’s recruitment team will inevitably weigh production against price. Twelve goal contributions last season offers a useful benchmark, while his current form strengthens Brentford’s negotiating hand. In that sense, this feels less like a speculative link and more like a name worth monitoring as the window approaches.
Our View
There is logic to this one, even if the fee gives pause. Kevin Schade sounds like the sort of player Liverpool should be looking at, quick, adaptable and already settled in the Premier League. The concern is whether £60 million, or more, is the right number to move for him in January.
That sort of money should bring real certainty. Schade has talent and he clearly suits a lot of what Liverpool need in the final third, but there is still a difference between being an exciting option and being the answer to an important squad issue. That is where the uncertainty kicks in.
If the club truly believes he can cover all three attacking positions at a high level, then the investment starts to make more sense. If he is viewed more as a useful rotation piece, it becomes harder to justify such a premium in the middle of the season.
Much depends on how severe Liverpool believe their attacking depth problem is. If availability remains a concern and the right side of the attack still needs proper support, Schade could be a smart solution. If not, this may be one to revisit in a different market, at a different price, with less pressure attached. For now, it feels plausible, but not without risk.


