Proactive vs Reactive | Liverpool's divided back four?

Proactive vs Reactive | Liverpool's divided back four?

Monday was disappointing wasn’t it?

After impressing for the majority of the first half, Liverpool went in at half time 1-0 down but with justification to remain positive that we could come back into it in the second 45. However, as we all know, it wasn’t to be and after 95 minutes we had been beaten 3-1 by last years champions.

Their strength and quality in depth shone through and we were given a harsh reminder of the level required in this league, a level that we must aspire to.

Proactive Reactive

But there was more to it than that. It wasn’t just about the billionaires club putting us to the sword, no. Once more, we played a massive part in our own downfall. Now I’m not about to break into a Twitter style over reactive, dramatic damning of individual players. I know how much we all like to blame Glen Johnson for his can’t-be-arsed attitude and the seemingly popular argument for pinning everything on Mignolet, even though he’s better than many give him credit for. The hero one week, the villain the next.

No, my own personal observation after watching the game again including replays of the goals is that our defenders collectively aren’t reading the same book, let alone being on the same page.

The first goal was a comedy of errors, with the guilty parties including Gerrard, Lovren and Moreno. Each of them put the next under pressure leading to an easy shot on goal (which Mignolet would have done well to have saved).

The third goal exposed the danger of playing a high line and any defender would have struggled to match the pace of Aguero having just come on. However it’s the second goal that is getting the most attention and this is the one that I also think says a lot about our defence.

The immediate online response was a meltdown in which Lovren took an absolute roasting from the majority of our fans. Apparently this was the proof that he isn’t the leader that he’s being made out to be and that his penchant for stepping forward will more often than not, will leave us exposed and put unnecessary pressure on his colleagues.

On the face of it, that may be a just criticism of him. After all, he’s renowned for doing it. But then again, if so many people know this about him, surely our scouting team and Brendan himself would be aware of it? Furthermore, is it purely coincidence that Moreno was alongside Lovren at the time yet Skrtel and Johnson were alongside one another a good few yards further back?

The point I’m making is maybe, just maybe, it’s this proactive style of defending on the front foot that Rodgers likes about Lovren. Could it be that, as the new kids and more importantly as Rodgers‘ buys, Lovren and Moreno we pushing up as they are being expected to do, yet the “old school” of Skrtel and Johnson still aren’t able to adapt and therefore it is their reactive natures that meant they didn’t step forward when they should have?

One of the few positives that many compliment Skrtel on is his last ditch tackles – a reactionary measure which is arguably unnecessary and if he instead defended on the front foot, read the game better and anticipated potential threats, would be avoided more often than not.

There’s an argument that for all the shouting that Lovren does, it doesn’t mean what he’s saying is worth hearing and it doesn’t look like Skrtel is taking any notice. This is already being repeated as a means of criticising Lovren, however surely there’s just as much reason to question Skrtel.

For all we know, Lovren could well be giving the instructions that he is supposed to be, but the lack of adaptability, game intelligence and proactiveness from Skrtel and Johnson means that we’ve now got conflicting styles within our defence. Great partnerships complement each other, great defensive units work together as one. Time will tell what the defensive line of 14/15 will go down as. You can’t help feeling we’ve all read this story before.

Comments

7 responses to “Proactive vs Reactive | Liverpool’s divided back four?”

  1. adam says:

    Yes. Exactly 100% yes. All the problems we’ve had in defence since Rodgers implemented his system have been because the defensive line just doesn’t have the balls to stay high and trust the proactive approach. The longer we go in games the deeper the defenders sit and if the midfield doesn’t sit deep too then massive amounts of space open up. It’s up to that defensive line to get high and stay high and Lovren was bought exactly because of how he plays. The rest of the team simply needs to get in sync with him. Skrtel will slowly come around, he’s just not used to playing that way and once the two CBs are in line it’s much easier for the wing backs to know where they should be. The spaces will close up and although we’ll still be vulnerable to all the risks that a high defensive line brings, at least we’ll be playing a consistent tactic that doesn’t fall to pieces.

    • TonyS says:

      One of the most sensible comments made.
      How anyone can expect new players to instantly click into an awesome defensive machine is beyond me. No matter how many times they practise it on the training ground, it’s only during the game when there are split-second decisions to be made that the machine will slowly start getting it together.

  2. Joel says:

    Agree 100%, good article. Maldini was quoted as saying (paraphrased) “When I have to make a tackle, I’ve made a mistake”. Lovren was screaming at Johnson and Skrtel to step out on more than one occasion and they simply wouldn’t. Second goal the killer unfortunately.

  3. Lee Thompson says:

    Skrtl has been LFC’s weakest defender for years. Once they have enough faith to go with Sakho and LOvren (and if Johnson can suffer a season long injury)….all will be well at Anfield.

    • Simon Ruskauff says:

      Completely my opinion as well Lee. I’ve never been a fan of Skrtel as he’s a liability and for Glen Johnson enough said as he’s very poor for over a year now. Can’t understand why he’s still in the team.

  4. Johnson for me is the weakest link in #LFC back four. Do not get me wrong… Johnson is a good player but lacks decision making at the right time. May be his latest injury is a blessing in disguise for Brenda Rogers who can now play Maquinllo on the right. I am not unduly worried having watched the game with Man City…. although City were stronger physically and in some respect technically better, #LFC did match City pound for pound until the first goal due to defensive error. The team will get better at full strength over the course of the season. Time will tell…….

  5. thehendo says:

    We should see Sahko and Lovren as the main partnership by the end of the season. I think that Rodgers is just allowing Lovren time to adapt to the way the team plays in his preferred position before starting the transition to the right side of the centre backs. Flanagan is probably the best option at right back as his more defensive approach would balance out Moreno’s attacking style.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Published by Anfield Index
Updated: 2014-08-28 08:04:23
12 Views