2 Sides to Brendan: Has He Done Enough?

Join AI Pro

As the reality hit upon Liverpool’s battered, embattled carcasses strewn across a flight that was hours late, preparing to challenge for the second time in nearly 60 hours, the supporters: certainly no less emotionally strained than the players and managing staff, saw their team slump to the jaws of defeat for just the second time in 2015, a resounding result that raised certain questions to the helm of discussion once more.

Despite the immense criticism one receives for merely having an opinion these days: especially via social media forms such as Twitter and Facebook where nearly everybody can have an opinion: those who delve into the nitty gritty of football, however, can still entertain the question, without receiving a monochrome of unrelenting abuse. And so, in posing the question to the world, it may be discussed.

2 Sides to Brendan

Has Brendan Rodgers done enough to justify patience with his handling of Liverpool Football Club? Moreover, will there be a point before the end of the season where alternatives not only could – but should be entertained, just as there was in the Christmas period, where Brendan’s career at Liverpool seemed to be deteriorating right before our very own eyes.

All of this postulating and pondering comes after yet another European exit. Granted, the justification for this one is made all the more abundant due to the fact it was the Europa League: but Liverpool only faced that predicament because of Rodgers’ mishaps earlier in the season: ask anyone where a side with Glen Johnson, Dejan Lovren, Jose Enrique and Rickie Lambert should be, and they’ll more often than not tell you the correct answer: smack bang in the middle of the table. Coupled with the fact that he had £120 million pounds to toy with in the summer (a point that may be getting tiresome, but is no less important as the season rolls on), can he be afforded the patience that many would give him should Liverpool find themselves in a Champions League spot again?

First, however, something must be stated. If Brendan Rodgers happens to continue on his rampage throughout the season, and manages to pick up third place in a blistering mixture of attack and cohesion, all without alienating any players further and making a proper imbecile of himself in his press conferences, then there’s no doubt that the manager should be afforded more time in his role.

But, here’s the sticking point for the entire discussion. Where is the line drawn between patience and progress? Where is the line between promise and reality, between potential and assurance, between results and performances?

It’s all well and good when you’ve got a manager that can go on blistering runs such as the high-octane, vivacious streak that Liverpool currently have in the Premier League in 2015. However, those results only came when Brendan actually learnt from his previous mistakes, mistakes made in the first half of the season. It’s a repetitive pattern too; last season didn’t fully kick into gear until the thirteen game-run in early 2015 that catapulted Rodgers’ side into realistic sight of their first Premier League title, and that was with the best player in the world at his disposal. Many promises were made amongst the media coverage of Liverpool’s summer spending spree; promises such as the solidity of a squad, the return of Champions League football to Anfield and the ability to compete on all fronts.

Analysing the latter above all: a certain definition of what “progress” entails is necessary if one is to measure Rodgers’ ability to capably manage Liverpool football club. Of course, expectations are to be tempered; there was no way Liverpool would see a repeat of Istanbul, nor was it likely the Premier League title would be within reach once again. Even so, the promise of a “squad”, with multi-faceted players and tactics has been, with even the slightest bit of optimism, a disaster. Alienations of Mario Balotelli, inability in the transfer market and refusal to properly adapt his tactics for the betterment of the game in front of him – or In-Game tactics, if you will – has cost Brendan Rodgers at various points this season. Need evidence? Thursday night’s loss to Besiktas highlighted all three of those points, not least the In-Game management.

Pretending for a second that the 3-4-3 formation was an innovation of Brendan Rodgers and not a call from the fans, the inability to properly adapt an overrun midfield, increasingly poor back three and inefficient duo of Raheem Sterling and Daniel Sturridge on Thursday night highlighted the flaws in Brendan’s game; flaws which were heightened even more by the plague of injuries that festered itself into Liverpool’s camp. These injuries, one would’ve thought, were offset by the £120 million pounds spent on increasing squad depth in the summer. Yet Brendan – much like his former mentor Jose Mourinho – much prefers, and in fact is only capable, of managing a team of around thirteen players, give or take one player. Any others (cough, Mario Balotelli), are deemed surplus and are therefore treated that way, good for making a couple of impacts throughout the season, and not much more.

*See Jose Mourinho’s treatment of Kevin de Bruyne, Andre Schurrle, and others if in doubt.

It took Jose Mourinho the freedom of being able to purchase whoever he pleased for him to properly utilise the talents afforded to him: a luxury not present with Brendan Rodgers, and nor should it be present. Rodgers’ failings in the transfer market were evident enough without the emphatic statement that was Adam Lallana’s ineffective display and Dejan Lovren’s horrendous attempts at defending. That is not to criticise the Croatian’s penalty; for which he was unjustly lambasted, but rather his atrocious defending; something which has plagued him all season long.

Then one must move onto the apparent catalyst for many of Brendan Rodgers’ sleepless nights: his inability to manage at team past the first stage of a European competition. Liverpool’s European record under Rodgers is nothing but disappointing. In 18 matches, they’ve won just 7 times, losing another 7 and drawing the other 4. They’ve scored 26 goals and conceded 28. They’ve yet to qualify for the second knockout stage of any European competition.

Now, as far as progress goes, one must consider whether progress can be defined as Arsenal’s steady, yet stagnant method of finishing fourth every year whilst not particularly challenging into the depths of European competitions, or whether the Atletico approach of managing to stick in there, surrounded by the echelon of top tier teams is not only to be admired, but to be implemented. The differences are by no leaps and bounds extreme, and if last season is to be believed, Brendan has it in him to challenge the big guns of English football. So why not implement a similar system of squad utilisation, clever tactics and grinding out results to ensure real progress? And maybe, one year, Liverpool will find themselves with a string of results put together: the same kind that got them to Istanbul in 2005. Unfortunately, while it is unlikely a repeat of Istanbul will be on the cards in the immediate future, Istanbul was the place once again where questions were raised. This time, however, they aren’t clad in celebratory remarks.

Despite the diatribe that this article has seemingly become, there is an equally important case to be had for persistence and patience with the still relatively young and still relatively inexperienced Northern Irishman. One mustn’t forget that this time last year, Brendan’s talents were being lauded over in the media. Of course, that was partially down the mercurial Uruguayan at his disposal, but can Liverpool have faith in a more solid structure next season, one where Brendan’s flaws have been highlighted, addressed, and fixed?

If he can adhere to having a season-long results-based plan, and not one where he merely finds his feet in the first three to four months, and blazes off down the track in the subsequent three or four months, then could the team’s consistency improve to a point where top four is no longer down to how long Liverpool can extend their unbeaten run?

Questions, questions and more questions abound, yet nothing is really concrete. I, for one, as a journalist-in-training who never stumbles into using the first person as a rule, should make my opinion clear, so that everybody else’s can be heard in equal merit. So, has he done enough to justify our patience?

Brendan Rodgers has made his impression on Liverpool. Tactically, he’s been as catastrophic as he’s been brilliant, though his transfers have largely been the latter. Guided by the mercurial talents of his frontline, and for a manager that seemingly holds the middle in the park in the highest regard, he has a real knack of being overrun in the midfield (see Tottenham, Manchester United, Southampton and Besiktas games for further clarity) and his defensive organisation is average at best, and far too reliant on the individual skills of his centre halves, without acting as a unit. His mediocre record in Europe stands to reason that he can’t handle a competition other than the Premier League, and if Liverpool really wants to achieve proper progress, then finishing fourth consistently isn’t enough. There needs to be real desire in Europe; not simply filling the spots.

All of this comes to a head when I consider the possibilities come the end of May. Say we finish fourth, and the run we’re currently on pulls us above Manchester United and Southampton into that prime time Champions League spot. Then, admittedly, Rodgers should be given one more chance at European football and absolutely no more chances at the transfer market. But any lower than fourth, no matter the performances, and alternatives should be considered: because real progress can’t be made otherwise.

There’s my opinion, and whilst I prepare for the incredulous amounts of abuse I’m about to receive via social media for having a consolidated opinion, the question will indeed hang in the heads of many for the remainder of the season. We wouldn’t be Liverpool if it were otherwise.

Thanks for reading. Please comment below with your opinions!

Join AI Pro


  1. Brandan Rodgers is doing a great job at Liverpool FC end of. Stop trying to act like a chic by analysing everything Brandan does. We’re going to make 4th this season which is always been our goal.This article written by a fan of LFC read a lot like it’s written by a mancs

  2. Im not sure what you expect from a Liverpool manager Alex. I’m not advocating we accept mediocrity, settle for 4th (or even 5th, 3rd or 2nd) and early European exits- I completely agree that all managers, Rodgers included, should be subject to scrutiny and examination. I certainly have no issue with your article, but do disagree with the premise.

    Following a miserable start to the season when it looked like Brendan had lost faith in his own methods, the turnaround he has performed is beyond reproach. He’s proven he can organise a team to defend, while maintaining an attacking threat. Many of the club’s summer signings now look like great prospects for the future rather than dismal failures.

    There seems a real reluctance on the site and especially on the podcasts to give Rodgers the credit he deserves for turning the team around this season. True, many of the problems came about through his own mistakes, but he’s done a fantastic job of fixing them (and it looks to have been fixed just in time). One example is that
    people criticised him for not playing Markovic and Can more at the beginning of the season, but maybe, just maybe, Rodgers knew they weren’t ready and didn’t want to throw them into a struggling team at the risk of damaging their long term career at the club. He was let down by more experienced professionals Balotelli, Lovren, Lallana and a host of other players already at the club before last summer during this period.

    Even if we just miss out on the Champions League this season I don’t see how another summer of change and upheaval will help the club progress. Rodgers has proved he can adapt to different systems and bring the best out of his group of players. Disposing of him in 3 months time would be a huge gamble I think, but it should all come down to the last 3 months of the season. If we maintain a positive trajectory in our performances (even if it ultimately leads to disappointment) I think he should be retained. Only a Dalglish-2012-style collapse could persuade me otherwise at this point.

  3. I’ve never read such utter crap in all my life. Love the way you’ve had to wait ages for one bad performance before you can actually post this agenda inspired drivel. Are you a fan of a rival team Alex? By the way, where is the rating button at the bottom of your article that allows you to select ‘poor’. You do realise that not all people may think your article is ‘awesome’? For the record LFC are extremely lucky to have BR. Yes, he has made mistakes but he is a young manager who is learning all the time, but most importantly he is a brilliant coach. Better I suggest than the fans who you claim seem to have made all his good decisions for him (but not the bad ones – they’re his of course!!) ultimately though, BR has had to operate all season without our best player being fully fit, whilst trying to bed in a raft of new signings & youngsters – all of this with hardly any time on the training field. I’m sure he will make more mistakes in the future but to be so critical at this stage smacks of someone who is trying to justify previous public statements of criticism or to back up your own agenda – either that or stems from a fan who has the sense of entitlement that would even make an Arsenal fan cringe. Please feel free to rate my response as either ‘Brilliant’ or ‘Wonderful’. Bob

    • So far in his three years he has always had a mediocre start to the season and a very good second half…Is that progress? If that continues we just stagnate like Arsenal. Alas, it seems you like mediocrity year after year.

  4. This article beggars belief, I’m not sure what the author expects.

    We have a young manager who is bound to make mistakes tasked with buying young players with potential with a smaller budget and less allure (due to lack of consistent European qualification) than our direct rivals.

    So far Rodgers has shown an ability to improve players, look at how Skrtel, Suarez, Sturridge, Henderson among others progressed under him. He’s shown a willingness to trust youth with Flanagan, Sterling and Ibe all promoted from youth/reserves to the first team. This is crucial if we’re to make the most of all the investment into and restructuring of the academy is to be worth it.

    And despite what the author would have you believe he’s record in the transfer market is pretty good, I can’t think of any complete disasters (bar Aspas) like we’ve had recently. Our past managers in recent memory have signed dross like Voronin, Jovanovic, Adam, Carroll, Konchesky among many others.

    Rodgers has signed some great players like Sturridge and Sakho and taken some gambles like on Borini and Mario but overall it’s a decent record with the resources he’s had and how attractive a prospect we have have been during his reign.

  5. I think the writer of the blog has a point, yes we have had a good run and the City game was the best we have played this season, although it has to be said City were poor compared to what they can do as a team.
    To me Brendan is an enigma, we started the season with the worst 16 game return in 50 years, the worst C/L run of performances I can remember and a midfield that went missing most games, I agree he has to be given credit for good runs but equally questioned on the rest.
    Starting our season in December has to put us at a seasonal disadvantage, no team can win the league starting with record breaking bad runs, unless he can start a season up and running especially with £110m investment ( I didn’t see Southampton start badly with their disruption and influx of players) he isn’t the manager we need, having said that it would be churlish to say if he reached 4th spot we should hand the reins over to someone else. Paco and Rafa had a fall out over how pre season training should be formulated and I think Brendan has to take a look at what he is doing as for three seasons his start has been poor to say the least, ok this season he had the world cup to cope with but every top team had that.
    I would like him to show me he is worth his place, as the OP I am undecided.

    • We were top of the table at the halfway point last year.

      The season before the team was adjusting to his methods as he was new.

      This season there was a large influx of new players and disruptions with injuries and we lost Suarez.

      So I personally don’t think we’ve gotten a fair idea of how his teams start a season, we know from experience we get better as the season progresses but his record stands at one good pre-Christmas season two bad pre-Christmas seasons but I think the sample size isn’t big enough or fair. In the two bad ones he had to adjust tactics and bring a lot of people up to speed to his methods, in the good one he had a settled squad that had largely been together since the previous winter window. So you can’t say either way.

  6. i love brendan rodgers dearly and given how young he is as a manager, we can only expect his brilliance to increase, that said the writer does have some points of concern i must agree with for instance the time he takes before realising and changing tactics when they’re not working, plus his defensive management skills coz like it or not, he only started appreciating Sakho once injuries to Lovren and co forced him to give the lad more game time.
    however regardless of the position we end up in top 4 or not we should give him an extra season, i have a feeling we’ll absolutely cherish him afterwards..


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Subscribe to AI Pro!

AI iPhone App!




betting sites in the uk


Betting sites




New bonuses at Justuk.club non Gamstop casinos


Gamblingpro.pro lucrative casinos without Gamstop


Play at top casinos not on Gamstop on Thegamepoint.io