Where is the praise for Liverpool’s transfer committee?

Join AI Pro

In English football there has always been an aversion to ‘the continental model’ of football management. The likes of Sir Alex Ferguson, Arsene Wenger and Bill Shankley were such enduring individuals at their clubs that the successes of their teams have been attributed to the all powerful men that ruled them. The great managers of English football dominated every facet of their club, and so, unsurprisingly, the attitude in this country has been sympathetic towards managers who want utter control of their clubs, because we have seen it work so well.

At Liverpool that meant that Rodgers’ complaints about the structure of FSG’s ‘transfer committee’ often appeared as preaching to the converted, no more than when you saw him on the sofa of Goals on Sunday. Aftter FSG’s initial strategy to target British youngsters under Comolli and Dalglish completely misfired, largely because British players are very expensive and not very good, Rodgers signed on condition that he would have final say in all transfers. Despite that, the presence of other people in the decision making process never sat well with Rodgers, and his denigrating moans to the media since his sacking have done a lot to muddy the reputation of Liverpool’s transfer committee.

Rodgers’ own eye for transfers was always pretty rubbish  – look at some of the awful strikers he wanted to lead his ostensibly attacking technical football, like Borini, Benteke, Lambert – but no one has perfect 20/20 hindsight on transfers at the time of purchase so I can excuse Rodgers to some extent. What really damned Rodgers though was that he brought his own ego into team selection. ‘Committee’ players like Sakho and Firmino, who he may not have wanted, were often sacrificed for underperforming ‘Rodgers’ players like Lovren and Benteke. Rodgers also seemed content with his own dissatisfaction with the committee leaking into the public sphere, often at the expense of the very players he was paid to manage.

The transfer committee under FSG has made mistakes, but unlike Rodgers – and a lot of people in football carrying a bit too big head – they were open to admitting and learning from them. The committee has grown and morphed, not just with new personnel, but with new methods and approaches to transfers and squad-building. Their endeavours have crystallised into positive results this season, propelled by both new recruits and also by earlier acquisitions who have been persisted with.

In terms of the new recruits, this summer the committee identified seven players that Liverpool managed to buy. Whilst it was disappointing at the time to miss out on talents like Ousmane Dembele and Mario Gotze, it was positive being linked with high-quality players at realistic prices, and the players we did sign all seem a great fit to a man. How many times, three months into the season, has it seemed like Liverpool managed a whole Summer transfer window without signing one dud? Mane and Matip look particularly inspired business for the club.

But as I mentioned, it is not just new purchases that are paying off. Lots of people said that Klopp was going to do massive surgery on the Liverpool squad in his first Summer window as he had done at Dortmund. It was not a ‘Klopp team’ people said, but once he had shipped out half the squad and bought himself a new team, finally Liverpool would have a Klopp team. That was the logic, but it did not materialise, partly because Jurgen Klopp is a wonderful coach, but also because the German arrived at Liverpool with a ‘Klopp team’ already waiting for him.

Adam Lallana, Roberto Firmino and Phillipe Coutinho look like they were selectively bred, genetically enhanced, and conditioned from a young age to play the Kloppian-way, yet all were brought in by the committee before Klopp arrived. Liverpool’s transfer team has been consistently identifying attacking players of a very certain profile, who are all able to play multiple positions, and who all work as hard as a centre-back or defensive midfielder. It has meant that Klopp only needed to a slight tweak personnel in his first transfer window, rather than perform drastic surgery.

It is not just who the committee are buying that is reason for their success, but how as well. Emre Can, Phillipe Coutinho, Joel Matip, James Milner and Divock Origi are all examples of Liverpool buying a player at the perfect moment in order to get maximum value for them. Clearly the managers have been heavily involved in a couple of these transfers, but the point is that is helpful having dedicated staff who can investigate players around the world who may be available for good value, especially because most scouting takes place during the season when the managers are busiest managing. And this may not seem like a massive point, as every club wants good value, but just look at Manchester United’s current transfer record, or Liverpool’s five years ago, to see how value is not easy to find for the top English clubs, who everyone knows are inundated with TV and sponsorship money.

Mistakes in the committee’s methods of recruitment have clearly been learnt from, and nowhere is this better shown than in the purchase of Roberto Firmino. With leaks to the press plugged, Ayre flew out to South America and wrapped up a deal for a high demand Brazillian attacking-midfielder, for a sensible performance-linked transfer fee to boot. Before any fan or journalist had a clue what was going on, pictures were surfacing of Firmino in a Liverpool shirt. It was utterly ruthless, masterfully done, and all without the help of a manager. Instead it was execute purely through thorough scouting and effective negotiations.

One final point on the success of the transfer committee is that it has provided a more stable route to the first team for our youngsters. With 99% of managers – even the successful ones – not lasting more than three or four seasons, it is incredibly hard to guarantee chances to young players over a long period. They inevitably have to work incredibly hard to earn the trust of any one manager in order to be picked ahead of experienced older team-mates, and so in periods of transition it is often the kids who lose out. However, the committee’s long term planning means that no player will be signed who a young player could not surpass. With staff beyond the manager invested in the process of building the right squad for the long-run, Liverpool now has the optimum structure for integrating youth for the future.

So when will the transfer committee get their overdue praise? For some people who are heavily invested in their own opinion that a manager should be the be-all and end-all of a football club, perhaps never. However, the success of the committee has shown that a division of labour amongst Liverpool’s backroom staff is the way forward. Jurgen Klopp has a great eye for talent, and arguably the most important position in the committee too, but his primary job is to manage the playing staff, to get the most out of the personnel he has available. In that regard, Klopp is the best elite manager in the league, so it makes sense, at least during the playing season when matches come thick and fast, to excuse him from time-intensive duties like scouting. Fortunately, the rest of the committee have shown that they are no mugs either when it comes to buying the best talent to bring Liverpool forward.

Join AI Pro


  1. Exceptional piece. I’ve been on the anti-committee bandwagon for a while and, not that I’ve really thought about it, but they really have changed a huge amount and made some brilliant signings in the past 18 months, so credit where it’s due!

  2. This is some of the worst drivel I have read about the transfer committee to date. For a start, I’d love to know how you got the inside trek on which players were transfer committee purchases and who were Rodgers buys.

    It’s also funny that you neglected to include the likes of Mario Balotelli and Stephen Caulker, two of the worst transfers in the history of the club, who were both a product of the oh so successful committee.

    Anyone with half a brain can see that the players that came into the team this summer and indeed last January, were not transfer committee buys but players that Jurgen Klopp bought.

    You are also forgetting to mention the amount of players that had to be offloaded during the last window in order to fund the incoming transfers.

    You also line up Rodgers as the patsy in all of this when his hands were tied when it came to transfers. Yes he made some poor buys but he should never had even been considered for the managers job at Liverpool. F$G wanted someone in the job that they could control. So you now have a situation where the blame lies with F$G for Rodgers and the committee.

    Also, Klopp is not the first manager to give young players a chance. Explain Ibe, Sterling, Flanagan etc that all got plenty of games under Rodgers.

    Don’t be so quick to forgive and forget. The transfer committee it seems doesn’t have the influence it once had at Liverpool and that is largely due to Jurgen Klopp and I hope that remains the case from this point on.

    It’s great to see a resurgent Liverpool again and long may it continue but it is down entirely to Klopp and his style of play rather than anything anyone in a suit has done.

  3. Everyone has a committee but some have a dof who is simply the head of those doing all the work. They sign off so it’s always the groups fault. Our club just has it harder because they can’t shop in the Champions League or Established Stars bins. They’ve had to go for potentials like Phil or Aspas and for risks like Balo. Hope for a winner. Klopp wants to breed kids into monsters who only know his brand of football. Cheap and young isn’t FSG it’s how the boss wants it.

  4. Cheap & young is exactly what FSG have had as their primary transfer targets since they implemented their transfer policy. There is a third facets to those requirements which you didn’t mention; re-sale value. This is not a policy that they have had to go with without choice. It’s a policy that they have promoted themselves and embraced.

    Flogging the old adage of we had no Champions League football so we couldn’t attract the talent is rubbish. Chelsea did it, Manchester United did it. The only reason we never attracted the top talent is because we wouldn’t pay the wages that players of that calibre ask.

    Yes, Klopp wants to breed kids into monsters as that is what he does but it also happens that his philosophy falls right into line with FSG’s in that we need to produce plenty of talented youngsters with high sell on value.

    I only hope that Klopp garners enough respect from FSG that they will let him do what he does best and build a team capable of challenging not only at home but in Europe too.

  5. I think FSG were rubbing their hands with glee when interviewing Klopp for the job. They were smart enough to see they had a guy who’s genuine philosophy of developing from within could make their own methods seem validated. The transfer committee were under instruction from FSG to act within age, budget, and re-sale parameters as a rule. OK they screwed up with Lambert, Balo etc because other players were deemed too expensive, but did pull off a number of good signings too, Clyne, Firmino, Lallana. With Klopp’s genuine philosophy fitting with short hands long pockets approach of FSG, it was going to be a match made in heaven.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to AI Pro!

AI iPhone App!




betting sites in the uk


Betting sites




New bonuses at Justuk.club non Gamstop casinos


Gamblingpro.pro lucrative casinos without Gamstop


Play at top casinos not on Gamstop on Thegamepoint.io