Chelsea 1 Liverpool 2 | The Story via Player Influence Pitch Maps

Chelsea 1 Liverpool 2 | The Story via Player Influence Pitch Maps

Liverpool FC’s third consecutive away victory was impressive at Stamford Bridge today. Not only was it a third consecutive away victory it was also two in a row at Stamford Bridge which not many teams have accomplished in the modern era. The victory stretches Liverpool’s unbeaten run to nine in all competitions and seven in Premier League games.

There will be a match report coming up on Anfield Index in the next day or so from Ravi Amin so I thought I’d take a different approach. Using Four Four Two’s impressive StatsZone app (available on the AppStore on you iPhone created by using Opta Stats) I’ve selected certain time ranges within the match to create the following images from the app.

A few things before we get started. All of of my comments in this blog are how I interpret the images from StatsZone. Obviously the main rule will be the larger the name the more influence they have had so most of this will be obvious but it’s definitely an innovative way of showing the story of the game.

1st Half

First Half : 12-45 minutes

The first half was pure dominance from Liverpool FC. Chelsea couldn’t manage a shot on target and were carved open on their right hand side with increasing regularity. Especially in the middle of the half when Johnson and Bellamy had both got behind the lines and had opportunities to square balls from the right. This is highlighted above where you can see how large Johnson’s name is. You can also see from the pitch map that Charlie Adam and Lucas Leiva dominated the midfield  and this was shown by the closing down of Mikel for the opening goal, scored by Liverpool.

The pitch map above shows how far advanced Liverpool’s full backs were. Johnson and Enrique both averaging a position around the half way point. Even Daniel Agger’s position was much higher than that of Skrtel’s.

Out of the Liverpool side it was Reina, Skrtel and Kuyt that seemed less influential in the half. Agger & Enrique were kept quite busy on the left hand-side and there were a few times where Enrique defended well and where Agger brought the ball away or cleared the lines well.

First Half : 28-45 minutes

Maxi made some excellent runs, ahead of lone striker Luis Suarez, and found plenty of space. Unfortunately he was not found by Suarez or his team mates often enough and the one time he was found, he scored. An example of Maxi’s positioning is the game at the Cottage last season. Again he started on the left in that game and was found in the right place at the right time for his first two goals. His third was a superb long range effort. His importance is underplayed and as fellow writer Simon Furnivall explained in his article earlier this month, we all feel Maxi is indeed the unluckiest man in Liverpool with his lack of game time.

In the second pitch map you can see how instrumental Lucas Leiva & Charlie Adam were for Liverpool FC in the last 17 minutes of the first half. Liverpool were totally on top and pinning Chelsea in their own half as indicated by how far the team is playing up the pitch. Interestingly Glen Johnson was not as effective as he was earlier on but Jose Enrique was now trying to overlap Maxi and Suarez at every opportunity as Luis, as shown above, was positioned a lot more to the left side of the box with Bellamy more right sided. This is the period in which Bellamy was causing havoc against the blues.

Suarez and Bellamy also featured prominently in the first half with Suarez doing a bulk of the running upfront and linking with players very well. The final ball was lacking as were attempts at goal but apart from that his positional play and running off the ball was superb.

Overall 1st Half Pitch Map

The overall first half pitch map shows exactly how dominant Liverpool were. Most of the players seem to have influenced the game from their respective positions indicating an almost perfect first half. The fullbacks overlapping Bellamy and Maxi to add width whilst the wingers playing were still very effective in linking up the play without providing “chalk on the boots” type of width.

 2nd Half

2nd Half - 45-67 minutes

As the old cliche goes; “it’s a game of two halves” and Chelsea made a change that really turned the games on its head. Sturridge for Mikel was a masterstroke not only because Sturridge scored but because of the space Juan Mata was able to command in the centre of the pitch. Immediately in the second half you can see how far back the side is.

Jose Enrique was kept busy winning some timely challenges against Mata when he was through as well as shielding the ball out of play. You can see that Johnson and Kuyt were being pushed back in this period of the game as Ashley Cole & Malouda really piled on the pressure; resulting in the equaliser. It was in this phase that Pepe Reina made one fabulous stop and had to hold onto a few long range efforts. Three shots came in this period including the goal so you can see why Reina was influential in the pitch map above. Charlie Adam was much more influential than Lucas in this phase as Lucas conceded a few free kicks.

2nd Half: 67-93 minutes

As indicated above Liverpool were not as influential in the latter stages of the second half (apart from the goal). Henderson and Johnson seemingly being the two that seemed to influence the game. Maxi Rodriguez spent most of his time supporting Jose Enrique at left back and Luis Suarez was the lone man in every sense this half. David Luiz seemed to get in front of him at every opportunity and stifling his game.

The goal scorers name the largest in this pitch-map indicating that he was the most influential which would be correct as he scored the winner. A special mention for Henderson who was the other player in the second half that came on and made a difference. His run of beating two players on the Liverpool right showed that he has a bit of skill .

2nd Half - 46-93 minutes

Looking at the second half pitch map I’d say that Enrique and Reina were the two most influential as they kept the game to 1-1 whereas there were chances for Chelsea to push them into a lead but Enrique and Reina stemmed the flow. As you can see Liverpool were fully on the back foot in the second half but with Agger and Skrtel really dropping deep to defend or clear the ball.

Vs Chelsea - Full Game Player Influence

The full game Player Influence pitch map is show above and it shows that the most influential players against Chelsea were Glen Johnson, Lucas Leiva, Charlie Adam, Jose Enrique and Luis Suarez. So the two full backs, the central midfield and our striker were where the game was won at the Bridge.

Summary

We feel all of the influential players mentioned were done so deservedly because:

  • Glen Johnson scored the winner.
  • Charlie Adam assisted the winner & also had a steady game in the middle of the park.
  • Luis Suarez worked his socks off running the channels and trying to create for others.
  • Jose Enrique was excellent defensively even though he and Agger both switched off for Chelsea’s goal.
  • Lucas Leiva had the most accurate passing accuracy as well as a very good duel success rate.

by

Founder of AnfieldIndex.com - crazy about LFC and numbers! Aiming to create a site that all LFC supporters can be proud of.

http://www.AnfieldIndex.com

Comments

18 responses to “Chelsea 1 Liverpool 2 | The Story via Player Influence Pitch Maps”

  1. sdma says:

    A load of rubish.

  2. Sal says:

    Ignore the first guy. He’s probably a Chelsea fan.

    Good use of the pitch map. Good Skrtel has a small name. That’s what you want for a defender. You’d expect bigger names for defending purposes but Enrique and Johnson attacked as well as our full backs have done all season.

    Adam was heavily involved in the game. It’s good when players stand up when required in the absence of our leaders in Carragher and Gerrard. Adam, Suarez did that. Suarez wasn’t at his sharpest. His passes weren’t accurate at times but he put in a good shift.

    It was a collected effort because we made Chelsea look ordinary at times. Good team performance. It’ll end up as one of our best wins of the season.

    • Thank you for the comment Sal. I totally agree the fullbacks have been very important for us this season and with Johnson getting the goal I feel he could push on and regain some confidence. Having Bellamy or Kuyt in front of him helped protect him as we saw at times both Kuyt and Bellamy were running back to cover.

      I liked the interchanging between players yesterday. If Bellamy was caught up field Kuyt would cover and if it was the other way around Bellamy would chase back.

      The pitch maps show that too as Bellamy & Kuyt’s average positions are very close to each other in the overall 1st Half Pitch map.

      This is where we faltered in the 2nd half as you can see Bellamy pushed further up giving Chelsea more room to play and this hurt us. I guess it’s why Kenny brought on Hendo as he did really well in his cameo.

  3. Aravind says:

    @sdma: If you can’t appreciate the article, then shut the heck up. Some one has put in a lot of effort to analyse things from a statistical perspective and bring some life into analysis of the games….

    Great going AI, really appreciate the work you guys have been doing…

    Cheers.

    • Thank you Aravind, appreciate that. We’re trying to give as much analysis on Liverpool games as possible and in different ways too. Glad you enjoyed it and thanks for the support. Appreciated. 🙂

  4. tate says:

    Nice perspective, though it highlights which players were more influential we all know it is down to the oppositions line up. Enrique was naturally influential because Ramirez was active and fluidity of the team is to shift towards the ball especially when defending. I think stats on challenges and tackles provides more insight than this methodology. Just a suggestion though ! 🙂

  5. Paul Boyham says:

    Nice article and good use of an app that I think is brilliant.

    Player influence is often misleading because centre mids and full backs generally have a lot of the ball (and therefore influence) anyway, but the screenshots show the true story for this game – Adam and Johnson were very influential. Amazes me that having a great game going forward from right back provokes the debate by some people to move Johnson to the wing – he influences games like this because he is good at attacking as a full back. His goal, for example, wouldn’t happen if he was right midfield – the winger cutting in allowed the full back that space.

    • Totally agree with your comment Paul. If Johnson was a winger in that position Ashley Cole would have naturally been a lot tighter. As Johnson was running onto the ball from deep it was at pace and he was able to nutmeg Cole. It would have been difficult to do as a winger there. Thanks for the comment.

  6. Rajiv says:

    sdma- you are sick chelski supporter. Show a site like this created by fans just for fans .
    Coming to the topic. Our CB has been rock solid except for patchy mistakes at the start of the season. I think the team has sunk in well . Remember our Starting XI had 6 new players who hardly played for not more than 3/4 months togoether. The team is just starting to Gel. The match against City is very crucial keeping their run of form in the mind. Coming up with 3pts would be Tremendous and with 1pt would be satisfactory. We definetely need to take up chances created and improve our finishing. I think We actually saw the Adam of Blackpool yesterday. But from this article I dont understand why is that Bellamy and Kuyt so closeby each other ? They could have very well used acres of space . Kuyt was again disappointing IMO. I dont know what our KING would do against City . Play Carra or will he be benched. IMO Agger and Skertel given their current form were and are fantastic.

    • Thanks Rajiv, appreciate the comment. It was weird about Kuyt/Bellamy but they were interchanging a lot in the first half as mentioned so I can see why they’re there. In the second half it all changed though as you can see in the images above. Thanks for the support. 🙂 The Man City game will be a different kettle of fish & I cannot second guess Kenny, that’s for sure!

    • Rajiv says:

      Yes No one can second guess Kenny actually. Noone expected Maxi to start against Chelsea. Yeah and I hope for a big win tomorrow

  7. Gunmachine says:

    Coming to this very, very late. Really interesting way to tell the story. Would love to see you use other info-graphics as well as this app, seems you have a knack.

    Also, lets bring City crashing back down to earth!

    • How I would love to inflict defeat on City! Believe me it’s what I’m dreaming of. After two draws with Norwich and Swansea people thought we wouldn’t be able to beat Chelsea. Now we go to the City game with confidence.

      An early goal is vital for us to get anything from the game as it calm us down. Thanks for the comment – we will strive to keep on using different info graphics for our articles and stories of the match weekly column. 🙂

  8. find mens says:

    Hey just wanted to give you a brief heads up and
    let you know a few of the images aren’t loading properly.
    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it
    in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Published by Anfield Index
Updated: 2013-11-01 16:30:38
6 Views