Why Liverpool Should Keep Diogo Jota This Summer

With Darwin Nunez expected to leave, Liverpool must be pragmatic. Finding a direct replacement for Nunez is already a difficult task. Attempting to replace both Nunez and Diogo Jota in one summer window is risky. The striker market is thin, competition is fierce, and top-class forwards are becoming harder to find. Clubs like Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United are also in the hunt. Replacing two key attackers at once could mean overspending or settling for second-best.

Jota’s Squad Value

Jota may have had a disappointing 2024/25 campaign, but his overall value to the squad remains clear. He is a proven impact player with a track record of scoring in decisive moments. From the opener at Ipswich Town to winners against Crystal Palace and Everton, Jota has delivered when needed. He also offers tactical flexibility, able to play centrally or from the left. That versatility will be vital for Arne Slot as he balances domestic and European commitments.

Focus on Strategic Rebuild

Liverpool’s rebuild is already in motion. Jeremie Frimpong and Florian Wirtz have joined, with more signings expected. But with Caoimhin Kelleher, Trent Alexander-Arnold and Jarell Quansah already sold, and players like Luis Diaz and Harvey Elliott also attracting interest, there is already enough change underway. Removing Jota would only add to the upheaval.

Instead of trying to completely overhaul the forward line, Liverpool should focus on one marquee striker signing and retain Jota as reliable depth. That gives the team continuity and avoids depending on young or unproven options too soon.

Sensible Planning for 2026

Jota is under contract until 2027, so there is no urgency to sell. Keeping him another year allows Liverpool to split their striker business across two summers. Replace Nunez now, then revisit Jota’s future in 2026 when the market may be more favourable. This phased approach ensures Liverpool stay competitive while managing the transition effectively.

This is an abridged version; the full article is available on our ‘It Was Always… Liverpool’ Substack page: